MUSCMedical LinksCharleston LinksArchivesMedical EducatorSpeakers BureauSeminars and EventsResearch StudiesResearch GrantsCatalyst PDF FileCommunity HappeningsCampus News

Return to Main Menu

Extreme stress, fear linked to mental illness

by Heather Woolwine
Public Relations
This article is the last in a series of four concerning the 2004 Update in Psychiatry.

On June 5, Dennis Charney, M.D., chief of the Mood and Anxiety Disorder Research Program for the National Institute of Mental Health, presented several models for resilience and vulnerability in terms of acute stress and neuromechanisms associated with reward, fear conditioning and extinction, and social behavior.

While much research and documentation of what happens when people don’t deal well with stress exists, Charney highlighted some traits that seem to facilitate resilience in the face of stress. He mentioned optimism, good intellectual functioning, effective self-regulation of emotions and attachment behaviors, a positive self-concept, altruism, an active coping style, the ability to disclose emotions, and social support as tools to combat all types of stress.

But for those who do not have most of these traits, responses to stress may evolve into anxiety disorders, and there are psychological characteristics that researchers say directly relate to those disorders.

Anxiety sensitivity (AS) is an individual’s response to physiological changes associated with anxiety or fear. Patients with anxiety disorders demonstrate exaggerated physiological reactions to stress because they misinterpret bodily cues and misperceive sensations as harmful or dangerous. Associated with a selective cognitive bias towards threat, it predicts the frequency and intensity of panic attacks and appears to be a trait abnormality that increases the risk for anxiety disorders.

Behavioral inhibition (BI), an inherited predisposition to increased physiological reactivity and anxious symptoms in unfamiliar environments, makes some individuals more vulnerable to anxiety disorders. 

About 20 percent of children have BI, but the environment-gene interaction is key to its manifestation. These children seem to be more susceptible to anxiety disorders or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after stressful events.

Charney said, “Although the phenotype and genotype associated with AS and BI have yet to be defined, a recent study revealed the presence of amygdala hyperactivity in adult subjects with BI in their child history.”

He further elaborated the clinical importance in learning more about the interaction between environment and genetic risk factors and their role in increasing the risk of anxiety disorders.

Charney used a study of U.S. Army Special Forces (SERE) and U.S. Navy Special Forces (SEAL) training to demonstrate vulnerability and resilience models and their relationship with severe stress situations.

He mentioned several neural mechanisms related to resilience and vulnerability to extreme stress, including reward, Pavlovian fear conditioning, inhibitory avoidance, reconsolidation, extinction, and social behavior. He suggested that Pavlovian fear conditioning may account for common clinical observations in panic disorder, PTSD, and depression, and that sensory and cognitive stimuli associated with or resembling the original trauma elicit panic attacks, flashbacks, and autonomic symptoms.

Excessive stress mediates the release of certain hormones and neurochemicals in the brain that facilitate the development of fear memories and thus, contextual fear, or inhibitory avoidance, may lead to chronic anxiety or depressive symptoms.

Repeated activation and reconsolidation may further strengthen the memory trace and lead to persistence of trauma-related symptoms, and failure in neural mechanisms of extinction may relate to persistent traumatic memories, re-experiencing symptoms, autonomic hyperarousal, and phobic behaviors.

A stress-induced reduction in dopamine and increases in certain transcription produce a dysfunction in reward circuitry leading to anhedonia and hopelessness.

Offering a “resilience prescription,” Charney detailed the following for the attendees:

  • Positive attitude: Optimism plays a big part, and although thought to be genetic, it can also be learned.
  • Cognitive flexibility through reappraisal: Traumatic experiences may be re-evaluated by altering their value and meaningfulness. Individuals can find the benefit (reframe, assimilate, accept, and recover), recognize failure as an ingredient for growth, and even suppress memories.
  • Embrace a personal moral compass: Development of a set of core beliefs that are not easily shattered, exhibiting strong faith or spiritual beliefs, altruism, and utilizing the neural model of morality, altruism, and evolution that is imprinted on the human brain.
  • Find a resilience role model: The person can be  from one’s life or an imitation of another figure. This is an extremely powerful learning tool and interacts directly with human values and morals imprinted on the brain.
  • Face your fears: Recognize that fear is normal and may be used as a guide. Facing fear improves self-esteem and it’s important to learn and practice the skills needed to face it.
  • Develop active coping skills: Minimize the threat, create positive statements about oneself in relation to the threat, and seek support from others.
  • Establish and nurture a supportive social network: It’s difficult to go it alone, so don’t try to. Great emotional strength can be found in close relationships with other people, and they can be a safety net in times of great stress or need.
  • Attend to physical well-being: It is well-known that physical fitness has positive effects on mood and self-esteem, and exercise has been proven to maintain brain function and plasticity.
  • Train regularly and rigorously in multiple areas: Change requires systematic and disciplined activity. Individuals should train themselves on emotional intelligence, moral integrity, and physical endurance.
  • Recognize, utilize and foster strengths: Individuals should recognize and engage their strengths in hard or stressful situations.


The Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety
“Fear is a ubiquitous emotion that is at the core of many psychiatric illnesses, including anxiety disorders and depression,” said Jack Gorman, M.D., Ester and Joseph Klingenstein professor and chair, department of psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine. “It’s of great relevance to understand the neural circuitry involved in the acquisition, maintenance, and extinction of fear.”

Gorman delivered the last presentation of the conference, offering numerous studies and preclinical data demonstrating that the lateral nucleus of the amygdala is critically involved in the conditioned fear memory. He said that conditioned fear in animals is a reasonable model of fear and anxiety in humans, and patients with anxiety disorders have a lower threshold for activation of the amygdala than non-anxious subjects. 

“At the same time, we and others have shown that other parts of a neural circuitry that we have called fear circuitry are also important in fear memory,” Gorman said. “For example, areas within the prefrontal cortex, including the anterior cingulate and the orbitofrontal cortex, modulate amygdala activity and abnormalities in these pathways also appear important in the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders. Knowledge of the neuroanatomy and molecular biology of fear enables us to evaluate the mechanism of action of effective anti-anxiety therapies and to predict new treatment interventions that may be superior to those currently in use.”

According to Gorman, anxiety disorders and/or depression represent abnormalities of an evolutionarily conserved fear mechanism. Brain circuits that subserve fear responses in experimental animals are involved in human fear and anxiety disorders, like the amygdala, hippocampus, and the prefrontal cortex. Current treatments for anxiety disorder interact with multiple brain systems including the fear system. He suggested that strategies for improved anxiolytic and antidepressant therapies are directed toward more specific interaction with the fear system.
 

Friday, July 9, 2004
Catalyst Online is published weekly, updated as needed and improved from time to time by the MUSC Office of Public Relations for the faculty, employees and students of the Medical University of South Carolina. Catalyst Online editor, Kim Draughn, can be reached at 792-4107 or by email, catalyst@musc.edu. Editorial copy can be submitted to Catalyst Online and to The Catalyst in print by fax, 792-6723, or by email to petersnd@musc.edu or catalyst@musc.edu. To place an ad in The Catalyst hardcopy, call Community Press at 849-1778.