Return to Main Menu
|
Mice living in crowded areas get
stressed
The following article describes one of
many poster presentations set for this year's faculty convocation Aug.
21. This year’s theme is “Creating Collaboration” and will highlight
various clinical, research and educational projects undertaken as a
group effort.
by Mary
Helen Yarborough
Public
Relations
A study using two types of female mice has concluded that rodents
living in high-density environments experience greater stress,
diminished immune indicators and are less inclined to roam around and
gain weight.
Drs. Deanne
Lathers, Kathy Laber and Lynn Veatch meet in the lab. Their research
study, “Effects of Housing Density on Stress, Immune Function and
Behavior,” will be presented at the faculty convocation Aug. 21.
The study, “Effects of Housing Density on Stress, Immune Function and
Behavior,” was funded by the Veterans Administration (VA) and was
a collaboration of MUSC and VA researchers headed by study initiator
Kathy Laber, DVM, MUSC vice chair of comparative medicine; behavioral
study leader Lynn Veatch, Ph.D.; stress hormone study leader Marcelo
Lopez, Ph.D.; and immune study leader Deanne Lathers, Ph.D. The team
worked collaboratively to develop the study design, and a grant request
to fund the project was written by Lathers. All of the researchers
except Lopez, a behavioral scientist for MUSC, have dual assignments
from the VA and MUSC.
For about 10 weeks, the study involved 180 mice, half of them a stress
resilient type called C57BL/6J (C57), and the other half a strain of
mice that is stress sensitive called BALB/c (BALB).
The two sets of mice were placed into 75-square inch cages at varying
densities: two mice per cage, five mice per cage and 10 mice per cage.
Mice had constant access to food and water, and the ventilated cages
were changed out every other week, which is standard.
Researchers studied indicators, including the stress hormone
corticosterone, physiology such as weight gain; behavior, such as
whether the animal’s movement was hesitant or exploratory; and the
immune system, which was analyzed for changes in levels of so-called
helper T-cells and the cytotoxic, or killer, T-cells. Helper T-cells
are those that direct immune responses, while cytotoxic T-cells attack
foreign or unwanted cells.
The study is unique because the research looked at a number of
variables in the high density study, Laber said. “Previous studies have
not systematically evaluated the effect of housing density and duration
of housing density on behavior with in-depth analysis of immune
function and stress,” she added.
Researchers were not surprised by most of the results that showed that
a more crowded environment increases stress levels in more high-strung
BALB mice, but they seemed perplexed that the more laid back C57 mice
also showed increased indicators of stress.
“For the C57s, there was an impact at the high density population,”
Laber said.
Unlike the BALB, the C57 gained weight, which would indicate stress
resilience, but they also experienced increased levels of
corticosterone levels. All four stress indicators were altered
for the BALB, including its behavior.
Laber said that behavior response was evaluated in two ways: how much
time the mouse spent hugging the walls as through afraid to move; and
how much time is spent moving about the cage.
“What we saw in the animal that was stress sensitive, when they were
housed at 10-mice per cage, they decreased activity and didn’t want to
move,” Laber said. “For the stress resilient mouse, the high density
didn’t affect them.”
Another behavior measured was the mice’s exploratory response—how many
times the mouse moved from the outside edge of the cage to the center.
“The BALB froze,” Laber said. “And the C57s were less reluctant to
explore. It affected their behaviors in different ways. …but both
showed some level of stress behavior. …This means that both types of
mice could show higher levels of stress,” Laber said.
Next, the researchers will break down the T-cell responses in more
detail to see which may or may not have been impacted by the density
response, Lathers said.
“We’ve covered a lot of disciplines: behavior, immune, physiology,
stress hormones. And we managed to hold this case size while we
modified the variables,” Laber said. “In other studies, they have
changed the cage size, for example. We kept everything the same so that
it was relevant.”
Whether the results could prove helpful in understanding stress
responses in humans remains to be seen. Lathers said that it is
possible that the study would consider human stress responses at a
later date.
What is more immediately useful, however, is that the study could help
researchers save a lot of research dollars by increasing the number of
mice per cage.
Currently, the standard cage population limit is a maximum of five
mice, according to the National Academy of Sciences. Research
institutions must adhere to this standard to maintain accreditation.
Although the cost to maintain a cage of mice is less than a dollar at
MUSC/VA, the costs can add up if large numbers of mice are used. Laber
said that if certain mice indicate relative comfort in a more crowded
cage, then the evidence could be presented to the national academy and
potentially influence the density requirements for housing mice.
Meanwhile, Lathers credited assistance from students and facility staff
for making this study possible. “MUSC student Jennifer Mulligan and lab
technician Kiki Gibbs were instrumental in the study,” Lathers said.
“And thanks also to Krista Harris and her staff at the VMU that were
instrumental in weighing the animals, changing the cages and checking
on the status of the animals.”
When it is completed, the study will be submitted for publication in a
professional journal.
Friday, July 27, 2007
Catalyst Online is published weekly,
updated
as needed and improved from time to time by the MUSC Office of Public
Relations
for the faculty, employees and students of the Medical University of
South
Carolina. Catalyst Online editor, Kim Draughn, can be reached at
792-4107
or by email, catalyst@musc.edu. Editorial copy can be submitted to
Catalyst
Online and to The Catalyst in print by fax, 792-6723, or by email to
catalyst@musc.edu. To place an ad in The Catalyst hardcopy, call Island
Publications at 849-1778, ext. 201.
|