Faculty Senate: handbook, nominationsThe Faculty Senate met Aug. 4 and was called to order by Adrian Reuben, M.D. The next meeting will be held at 7:45 a.m. Tuesday, Sept. 11, in the Administration/Library Building, room 107.Business
His meeting with Crouch was to discuss the introduction of a universal faculty contract. Higerd had presented an historical perspective and review of the contract at the Faculty Senate meeting in July where he also described changes to the contract precipitated by the faculty’s concern. Many faculty had expressed that the original university faculty contract contained language that was in conflict with the Faculty Handbook. Also in the initial draft of the proposed model university contract, department chairs could change a faculty’s salary and term of appointment at will. Some colleges/departments had adopted the earlier flawed contract and in several instances, faculty were coerced to sign the contract as presented. Subsequently, several variations of the contract have been distributed throughout the university causing confusion and inequity in its application. The provost expressed a desire to link a faculty contract with a defined base salary and had requested input from the Faculty Senate. An ad hoc committee from the senate, chaired by Richard Hernandez, Dr.P.H., will work on the base salary issue and make recommendations to the senate. Several senators have agreed to serve on this ad hoc committee including Luis Leite, DDS, Jenny Ariail, Tara Hulsey, and John Bosso, Pharm.D. The ad hoc committee will be complete once representatives from basic science and clinical medicine are identified. Upon completion of the ad hoc committee membership, the member list will be submitted to the provost, who will then charge the committee. Higerd and university counsel Joe Good will be ad hoc members, but the committee will be able to meet without them, if need be. The question was asked concerning provost’s reaction to Reuben unhappiness about the unacceptable wording (which has now been removed from the latest version of the model contract) and the coercion. He reported that the provost did not express disagreement and concurred that coercive behavior is not appropriate labor relations in a university. Faculty Handbook
The initiative to revise the Faculty Handbook includes completing editorial changes, inserting changes that have been Board of Trustee approved, and identifying changes that need to be made. Margolius recommended that Reuben be asked to participate in the ongoing revision of the Faculty Handbook after his tenure as a senator expires. Reuben expressed willingness to work on the faculty handbook, as there is precedence for non-senate faculty working on committees. It is important that the revised Faculty Handbook be as error free as possible and made so good that it can work effectively as the contract. As an example, Reuben identified several conflicts in the preamble of the current Faculty Handbook concerning its relevance to faculty contracts, which should be corrected in the revised document. Update on Legal Counsel
Gender Equity
Senators should consider participating more actively in the process. Once gender is addressed, then the Faculty Senate can use this as a model to deal with other minority issues. Faculty Senate Nominations and Elections
Newly elected senators will be asked to attend the September meeting as observers and will be officially installed in October. Virus Protection Software
Internal Audits
Whereas it is extremely important to comply with recognized audits, there have been several complaints centered around the fairness and conduct of the internal auditing process. In instances, internal auditors have visited units without prior notification or informing the director and without explaining exactly what they were investigating. Since Internal Auditing does not fall under the president’s jurisdiction (but the Internal Auditor reports directly to the Board of Trustees who fund him), Reuben asked senators to discuss the current state of internal auditing with faculty to determine whether there is a consistent pattern or simply isolated aberrations, so that questions could be forwarded to the Board of Trustees, if necessary, for clarification and possibly the modification of the internal auditing process towards greater openness and fairness. Other Business
|