Accrediting counsel to set resident duty hoursby Dick PetersonPublic Relations All that dust kicked up these days over resident duty hours should settle after a June meeting of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. At least that’s the prediction from MUSC otolaryngologist J. David Osguthorpe, M.D. As chair of the ACGME’s Residency Review Committee (RRC) for otolaryngology, Osguthorpe will meet along with the members of the council’s 28 RRCs and their subspecialities to set a duty hours standard for residents in accredited graduate medical specialty programs nationwide. He expects the meeting to take the character of a sequestered jury. “We’ve been told we will come up with a decision, and we will stay there until we do,” Osguthorpe said. In his opinion, an ACGME standard for resident duty hours is a far better solution to the apparent inequities and isolated cases of resident abuse than could be set by state or even federal law. “There’s a problem with a legislative mandate,” Osguthorpe said. “It doesn’t place sufficient emphasis on resident education, and, per usual, it’s an unfunded mandate.” From a time when federal funding for graduate medical education was at 12.8 percent of Medicare reimbursements to teaching hospitals to today’s level of less than 6 percent, it has become apparent that federal support will continue to wane. In fact nothing about the education of physicians seems to be a priority in state or federal legislation. An unfunded mandate is more than likely an unenforced mandate, Osguthorpe said. Federal agencies are neither equipped nor funded to enforce federally mandated standards. The physician-run ACGME, however, governs residency programs in the United States through peer-review enforcement of curriculum standards and accredits programs on one- to five-year increments. Its accreditation, which is awarded, modified or withdrawn based on its reviews, serves as a guide to medical school graduates applying for quality residency programs. At the meeting in June, Osguthorpe expects the standard on duty hours to be based on already established guidelines that include one day off per week unmolested (no on-call) and no more than every third night on call, in house. Heretofore the only specific duty hours required by the ACGME has been for emergency medicine residents. For the rest, the ACGME has left the weighing of time for patient care against medical education up to the individual specialty program as long as teaching staff are readily available. “Residents should not be used solely for service needs—starting IVs, doing EKG’s—and should be provided adequate sleeping and food services,” Osguthorpe said. Beyond that, duty hours and on-call time periods must not be “excessive,” according to ACGME guidelines. The purpose of a graduate medical program is education, not cheap labor. In 1999, 19.5 percent of the residency programs surveyed by the ACGME had potential problems with duty hours, Osguthorpe said. When review committees examined the problems and provided instructional materials urging programs to “pay more attention to duty hours,” complaints dropped to 8 percent and in otolaryngology, with which Osguthorpe is most familiar, to 3 percent. Most complaints to the ACGME come from residents in general surgery, pediatric surgery, neurosurgery and from some internal medicine subspecialities, he said. And complaints about resident duty hours are almost never isolated. Osguthorpe said they are usually accompanied by other serious problems in a residency program. Medical education competencies increasing
But maybe it’s not enough. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has added four general competencies to the original two as a “... first step in a long-term effort designed to emphasize educational outcome assessment in residency programs and in the accreditation process,” according to council literature. During the next several years, practice-based learning and improvement, interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism, and systems-based practice will be incorporated into ACGME’s Residency Review and Institutional Review committees’ requirements. As chair of the Residency Review Committee for otolaryngology, Osguthorpe, is closer than most to planned curriculum changes for residents, the thinking behind them, and how they will be implemented and reviewed for accreditation in residency programs throughout the country. “These additional competencies will become reality as residency programs incorporate them from within the next two to three years,” Osguthorpe said. “Many institutions are putting together courses on ethics, for example, to be taken by all residents. Others are offered by the educational arms of specialty societies who put together modules that are specialty-specific and often Web-based. Indeed, such is being done by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (about 12,000 members), of which Osguthorpe is the coordinator for education. “It sure helps that I know, as the RRC chair, exactly what the new requirements will be, and in what time line for implementation, so I can then ensure that such is available to residents and program directors from one of the nine AAO-HNS education subcommittees that report to me,” Osguthorpe said. “Primary care residency programs and national societies are ahead of the other specialties, but, fortunately, they have been very willing to share what they have developed” Osguthorpe said, adding that the efforts to comply with ACGME requirements will come from within each institution and each residency program. The residency program must require its residents to develop the competencies in the six areas below to the level expected of a new practitioner. Toward this end, programs must define the specific knowledge, skills, and attitudes required and provide educational experiences as needed in order for their residents to demonstrate the competencies. Patient care
Residents must demonstrate a commitment to carrying out professional responsibilities, adherence to ethical principles, and sensitivity to a diverse patient population. Residents are expected to:
Residents must demonstrate an awareness of and responsiveness to the larger context and system of health care and the ability to effectively call on system resources to provide care that is of optimal value. Residents are expected to:
|