MUSCMedical LinksCharleston LinksArchivesMedical EducatorSpeakers BureauSeminars and EventsResearch StudiesResearch GrantsCatalyst PDF FileCommunity HappeningsCampus News

Return to Main Menu

Rumor Mill separates fact from fiction

CMH Moving
Rumor: At CMH we constantly hear conflicting reports about when we will be moving out of the building. Some say April, some July, others say it will not be until next year. When will the staff start showing up somewhere else to clock in? 
Truth: The facility planners working on the design of the new replacement hospital are currently evaluating its location in relation to Charleston Memorial Hospital. There is still much work to be completed prior to developing any strategy which could include abandoning CMH. Employees will be notified about the future of CMH as soon as possible after any decision is made. As usual, the Medical University and the Medical Center will work to assure as orderly a move as possible if this should be the decision. In any event, if CMH  is vacated, the concerned employees will be offered other opportunities within MUSC. 

Traveler Orientation
Rumor: First...I was wondering why there is so little support from the nursing education department for traveler orientation in regards to accomodating the fact that 99 percent of the travelers that come to work at MUSC are from another state and do not have  an inkling of the area of Charleston? When starting on the first day, imagine coming here, having never seen MUSC, and being expected to find all of the different buildings and streets by yourself. There is no organized tour available prior to start date. Second...I was also wondering why the numerous tests could not be completed  before getting to MUSC, at the registered nurse's leisure, seeing as it is all open book testing anyway. And why no breaks given, or any water availability during the five hours of testing that are required to work at MUSC?
Truth: Currently, the first day of orientation for travel nurses includes a book of self-paced learning modules which, on average, takes the nurse approximately four to five hours to complete. The subjects covered are generally the same as  those considered mandatory for all staff nurses, such as medication safety, billing compliance, restraint and seclusion, etc. Within the next several months, as CATTS (Computerized Annual Training and Tracking System) is rolled out to all units, these modules will be included so that travel and per diem personnel will be able to access them via Internet from their homes. Completion of these modules before coming to MUHA will allow more time that first day for other training to be given to the nurse in regards to OACIS, the Nurse Intensity System, HARP, and our other database programs. Specific questions regarding the orientation process can be addressed to Julie Adam, nurse manager of the staffing office. 

Locker, Shower Room
Rumor: I have been told by a person that saw the plans that the area including the locker/shower room in room 103 of the Basic Science Building will be renovated into a research laboratory. Is this true and if so, what will students, faculty and staff use in place of this facility. 
Truth: It is true that some of the locker room area will be renovated to accommodate the Proteomics Center. This space (103) is being converted into a proteomics lab under the leadership of Dan Knapp, Ph.D. The men's showers will remain intact, but two stalls will be removed from the men's restroom. The women's restroom will remain fully intact, and likely will be upgraded based on feedback from building occupants. Additional work will include removing the lockers from room 103, BSB, shutting off  access into the men's room, and providing a new entrance into the men's room  from the back hallway (adjacent to the women's room). Lockers will be installed in a new  pattern with new flooring in room 115 (old mailroom). We have closely assessed the number of lockers in actual current use to assure that there will still be adequate numbers of lockers available for students when the work is complete. 

Pay Raises
Rumor: MUHA fiscal year is from July to July. The administrators decided that for the new fiscal year starting July 1, 2002, the merit raises would be decreased by 1.5 percent. Why didn't those who received an evaluation prior to this date July 1, 2002, receive the raises of 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5 that had been decided for the previous fiscal year? These employees evaluations were already on file and were told that their raises would be the older higher percent and not the reduced amount that did not go into effect until July 1, 2002. Also another issue that seemed to happen was that our holiday pay differentil was not on our checks for the month of January. I find it disheartening that we have possibly been cheated our of our pay. Also we were told our increase in shift diff was effective Jan. 1, and after this date , we were told that  it would be later in the month. 
Truth: The MUHA Human Resources compensation policy #15 explains how the performance pay plan is handled on a year-to-year basis. MUHA's budgetary situation (i.e. ability to fund) and the competitive market are key factors in determining performance pay on a year-to-year basis. The policy #15 is posted on the Medical Center Intranet. The performance pay policy for this FY is attached to the compensation policy (see section II. E. of the compensation policy for a link to the FY 02/03  performance pay plan). If it appears to any employee that the pay policy, including holiday pay or shift differential, is not appropriately administered then Susan Carullo, human resources manager of employment and compensation (792-1684/e-mail: carullos@musc.edu) or Patty Burn, payroll coordinator (792-7544/e-mail: burnp@musc.edu) should be contacted. If anyone has questions about the rationale for how the compensation or FY performance pay policies are designed, contact Carullo. 

Freelance Work
Rumor: I have heard that employees of Marketing/Creative Services have been taking excess work home with them and charging for the work done on a freelance basis. Isn't this illegal, and wouldn't it make more sense to pass the work to another department within the university? Why are some support departments, like public relations and marketing, fully funded and able to give away their work, while others, like Art Services and Digital Imaging, are cost recovery and have to charge?
Truth: The director of Medical Center's Business Development and Marketing Services reports that no employee is being paid as a contractual service provider (freelancer) for any marketing-related work. But, this does not preclude any employees from “moonlighting” (i.e. working on non-job related projects on his/her own time)  provided state ethics laws are followed. The Marketing Department is funded by Medical  Center (Hospital Authority) generated funds. Marketing is essential for enhancing Authority revenues. The Marketing Department tracks its projects and prepares return on investment reports to justify costs for marketing initiatives. Also the Marketing Department may purchase other services (such as AV services) as needed to meet demands. Some of these services are purchased internally, but not all. Services purchased depend upon the competitive market costs and the ability to meet deadlines. The PR function is essential for dissemination of important information to the media, preparation of MUSC publications, and for coordination of special events. While PR provides an essential function, a relatively small operating budget is earmarked for public relations. MUSC, like other state institutions, is facing substantial budget cuts and must set funding priorities. The competitive market readily provides art and digital imaging services. Also, advances in technology have enabled a considerable amount of this work to be done by departments. The decision for Art Services and Digital Imaging  to be a cost recovery service is based on the premise that MUSC should be able to  provide this service in-house at cost not to exceed the cost of such service if purchased  in the competitive market.

Wachovia Bank Building
Rumor: The Wachovia Bank is moving out of 165 Cannon Street in May. Rumor has it that the bank building is scheduled to be torn down. Is this true? 
Truth: The University Master Plan completed in 1998-99 called for the eventual replacement of the bank building with a parking garage. As of the present, no funds have been identified for that purpose. During the planning phase of the Replacement Hospital, Phase I, scenarios for the replacement of the bank building were developed. One included a parking garage on the bank site. At this point it is not clear whether that  recommendation will be followed. However, if it is followed all occupants of the building will be relocated in other spaces on campus. We believe most university and authority employees would agree one of the most pressing needs for our campus is parking. Therefore, if funding is available and relocation of the occupants is achievable, then a parking garage on the bank site is a viable option.

Reproduced from http://www.musc.edu/rumor/
 

Catalyst Online is published weekly, updated as needed and improved from time to time by the MUSC Office of Public Relations for the faculty, employees and students of the Medical University of South Carolina. Catalyst Online editor, Kim Draughn, can be reached at 792-4107 or by email, catalyst@musc.edu. Editorial copy can be submitted to Catalyst Online and to The Catalyst in print by fax, 792-6723, or by email to petersnd@musc.edu or catalyst@musc.edu. To place an ad in The Catalyst hardcopy, call Community Press at 849-1778.