Return to Main Menu
|
VA program enhances career development
by Cindy
Abole
Public
Relations
It’s been two years since Veterans Affairs (VA) Senior Research Career
Scientist Rita Young, Ph.D., took the reins as associate chief of staff
for research and development at the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center.
Since 2003, she’s steered VA research through an upswing of change
while keeping her focus on opportunities for maintaining quality
clinical research programs and enhancing career development among
researchers.
Dr. Rita Young,
left, and Dr. Lina Obeid, second from right, join newly-funded MREP
researchers Drs. Ashley Cowart and Kory Johnson.
Her presence and long-term experience with the VA research system
helped facilitate administrative changes that allowed fellow VA
scientists—both established investigators and early-career
scientists—to achieve grant funding while deepening their
interdisciplinary collaborations as they continue to make strides in
health science research.
Aside from developing research and mentorship opportunities, Young is
also committed to making the medical center’s research more visible.
In 2004, she was voted by her peers to serve on the VA’s newly created
Field Research Advisory Council (FRAC), a program composed of nine
leaders representing various levels of the VA’s national
corps—rehabilitation, biomedical, clinical science and health services
research—who meet regularly to discuss the future and direction of VA
research. The group’s membership includes both physicians and Ph.D.
investigators.
Some of the latest issues discussed by FRAC involve funding and the use
of budget caps to stretch limited research dollars and a renewed
emphasis on funding entry-level investigators under the current program
criteria. According to Young, the FRAC committee was responsible for
recommending how to attain a 25 percent research funding level.
Young also chairs and is a member of the Veterans Integrated Service
Network (VISN) 7 Research Council which is composed of the other heads
for research at seven VA centers in South Carolina, Georgia and
Alabama. The group focuses on issues such as research funding.
Earlier this year, Young and the Charleston VA Research and Development
Committee nominated 20-year VA career researcher, John Raymond, M.D.,
as a research program investigator candidate for this year’s Henry M.
Middleton Research Excellence Award. Raymond was formally presented
with the award at the VISN 7 Fall Retreat on Oct. 27.
“Rita has helped organize our VA research office so that it is very
efficient, effective and highly visible,” said Raymond, who is also
MUSC vice president of academic affairs and provost. “She’s continued
to foster a service-oriented approach to interacting with investigators
on campus. For someone who’s as successful with her research as well as
her mentorship abilities as Rita has been, we are fortunate she is
willing to spend so much time and energy focusing on every little
detail of a grant proposal. The small things make a huge difference.”
Young’s VA Research Office helped guide a stream of successful
grant-funded research. In the October 2005 funding cycle, the VA Office
of Research and Development awarded 10 grants to MUSC-VA career
scientists and new investigators—a remarkable achievement for one VA
institution competing for research dollars at a time of slow growth and
budget-cutting, according to Young.
For junior-level scientists seeking their start in the VA research
track, Charleston’s VA Research Office promotes several successful
career development awards programs and mentor-ing opportunities. The
VA’s Research Enhancement Awards Program (REAP) promotes collaborative
research among a cadre of investigators sharing a common interest in
health services research, rehabilitation research, biomedical and/or
clinical science research. One of the primary foci of REAP is to serve
as a training ground for young investigators. The second is the Merit
Review Entry Program (MREP), a career development program designed for
beginning doctoral-level, non-clinicians combining an emphasis on
research with a strong mentoring program.
MUSC’s Korey Johnson, Ph.D., Ashley Cowart, Ph.D., and Amanda LaRue,
Ph.D., were named MREP-approved scientists earlier this year. Johnson
and Cowart will be mentored by VA investigator Lina Obeid, M.D., while
Young, serves as a co-mentor to Johnson and LaRue.
“MUSC’s campus has a lot of talented, young investigators,” said Obeid,
who worked with Johnson and Cowart. “The MREP is really a nice venue to
help scientists bridge their post-doc years to become independent
investigators. It’s a special program for the VA. When post-docs
qualify for it, it opens doors and it allows them to take their
research to the next phase of career development.”
Cowart was a post-doc fellow in the lab of Yusuf Hannun, M.D.,
professor and chair in the MUSC Department of Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology. Cowart’s research looked at the role of
sphingolipids and the role of cellular stress responses especially in
diabetes. Her area of focus evaluated fatty acids and the regulation of
sphingolipids as a model for insulin-resistance in diabetes.
“The MREP was a great opportunity for me to learn how to progress from
the role of a post-doc researcher to a semi-independent investigator,”
said Cowart. “During the interim period, we focused on grant writing,
budgets and learning how to direct and manage an independent research
program. With the success with MREP, I look forward to working towards
the next level of awards and new opportunity with the VA Merit Award.”
A post-doc fellow in Obeid’s lab, Johnson studied the linkage between
sphingosine kinase to lung cancer, a disease relevant to the VA
population. Concentrating on the dissecting role of an enzyme in lung
cancer and metastasis, Johnson’s work later involved Young and other
experts with other metastasis models from their research work.
“Between Dr. Young and I, we know we can help Korey progress to the
next phase of research which might include looking at animal models of
lung cancer, and hopefully proceeding to future therapeutic studies in
patients,” Obeid said. “Both Korey and Ashley submitted strong,
clinically relevant proposals. What has occurred is a natural extension
from the work they began in the lab of VA investigators. With funding
approved, they can both focus on research that will help improve the
health of the veteran’s population.”
Young also credits her staff for refining and maintaining a
service-oriented VA Research Office. Upon her arrival in June 2003, she
realized the benefits that could be derived if the research office
provided assistance to researchers beyond the usual administrative
role. Within two years, she imposed administrative changes to enhance
the development, preparation and eventual processing of grant
proposals. Most of the changes involved developing streamlined
processes, computerization of forms, initiation of a central LAN within
the office, and the acquisition of computerized equipment designed to
produce superior products. Her office includes four staff members
dedicated to providing assistance to grant-seeking researchers, in
addition to staff assisting in budget development, human subjects,
animal use and safety.
Although VA investigator-applicants may be focused on initially
starting an application, many lack the experience and cannot devote the
amount of time necessary to coordinate and complete the large amount of
administrative sections of their application including budget
pages, bio sketches, letters of support, etc. that are required
for VA grant proposals.
An experienced VA grant reviewer, Young knows what’s needed to help
distinguish a winning grant proposal.
“A grant reviewer wants to read a great quality product, so an
applicant must submit a great quality product,” Young said. “The goal
is to allow the investigator to focus his/her time on writing the
science and providing meaningful feedback and suggestions on how to
better design and present the work proposed via a strong, intramural
review process.”
While the scientific piece is addressed, the Research Office works
toward insuring all the required forms, letters and other supporting
documentation are included and addressed, producing the best final
product possible, according to Young.
“Everything a reviewer sees, touches and experiences assures them of
the quality level of the product they hold in their hands,” Young said.
“These details are part of a granstmanship component that is just as
important as the science conveyed in the proposal.”
Friday, Oct. 28, 2005
Catalyst Online is published weekly,
updated
as needed and improved from time to time by the MUSC Office of Public
Relations
for the faculty, employees and students of the Medical University of
South
Carolina. Catalyst Online editor, Kim Draughn, can be reached at
792-4107
or by email, catalyst@musc.edu. Editorial copy can be submitted to
Catalyst
Online and to The Catalyst in print by fax, 792-6723, or by email to
petersnd@musc.edu
or catalyst@musc.edu. To place an ad in The Catalyst hardcopy, call
Community
Press at 849-1778.
|