Return to Main Menu
|
Teaching physicians to support
breastfeeding
by
Heather Woolwine
Public
Relations
New and veteran mothers often exchange birthing stories. These same
mothers have breast feeding stories, too, which are as varied as the
women who tell them. One thing most of these women will have in common
is that any discussion of the subject with their obstetricians
generally was in passing. Most received a mixed message that did little
to support or encourage a mother to nurse her child.
Carol Wagner, M.D., neonatologist and MUSC’s breastfeeding medicine
expert, blames a lack of training for physicians during residency, not
only about the benefits and research that support breast feeding
children, but also how to talk about breast feeding with a patient, for
low breastfeeding initiation and retention rates in new mothers.
Dr. Shilpa Shah, a
participant in the breastfeeding curriculum for residents, discusses
techniques with patient Natalicia Costa.
To test this theory, MUSC and six other sites around the country,
including UCLA, Johns Hopkins and Duke, will study what impact a
breastfeeding medicine curriculum for residents might have on
initiation and retention rates for mothers and their babies. The Breast
Feeding Promotion in Physicians’ Office Practices is a three-year grant
funded through the Maternal & Child Health Bureau and was developed
by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of
Obstetrics and Gynecology. Overall, 70 sites throughout the world are
participating in this translational research study headed by principal
investigator Lori Feldman Winters, M.D., of Robert Wood Johnson
University in Brunswick, N.J.
Wagner serves as the MUSC site coordinator, and recent University of
New Mexico School of Medicine graduate Allie Chambers, M.D., serves as
the study coordinator. Currently, more than 50 pediatric, family
medicine and OB/GYN residents are enrolled in the program that will
conclude in June 2007. Wagner and Chambers will look closely at
breastfeeding initiation and continuation rates before and after
residents started the curriculum.
When Wagner first came to MUSC in 1992, breastfeeding initiation rates
were only 19 percent for level 1 babies (normal birth). Today, that
rate is 63 percent. For babies in the neonatal intensive care unit, it
was 25 percent. That unit now sees an initiation rate of 80 percent.
“At MUSC, we do pretty well and a lot of that credit goes to the great
lactation team that we have,” Wagner said. Wagner and Chambers’
ultimate goal is to reach 100 percent for all MUSC nurseries.
“This is really a prototype for what will hopefully become a standing
training program for residency curricula around the country,” Wagner
said. “It was a real honor to be selected to participate. A physician
sees a pregnant woman between eight and 14 times during her pregnancy.
That leaves plenty of time to discuss the medical benefits of
breastfeeding and why it is the best choice for babies and their
mothers.”
The program includes presentations given to the residents, reading
materials, an online breastfeeding education course and resident
participation in small group activities, such as a lactation support
group. The curriculum is designed to teach residents the health
benefits of breastfeeding, the skills needed to successfully assist mom
and baby in breastfeeding, the knowledge to help with common
breastfeeding problems, as well as how to get involved in breastfeeding
advocacy and how to address pertinent cultural issues related to
breastfeeding. Residents will also work with MUSC’s lactation
consultants.
“It’s one thing to know the value of breastfeeding and another to
encourage it,” Chambers said. “It’s not enough to simply explain the
research that supports breastfeeding. We’re hoping to get residents
excited about the many benefits of breastfeeding so that they will in
turn inspire their patients to overcome any barriers they may have to
breastfeeding their child. Physicians have a responsibility to create
an environment that is supportive to breastfeeding so that new mothers
have a chance of making it the AAP’s [American Academy of Pediatrics]
recommended target age of breastfeeding for at least one year, with the
first six months being exclusive breastfeeding.”
Abundant studies have documented the numerous benefits of human milk
for an infant, including reduced risk of adult and childhood cancers
and autoimmune diseases.
Wagner said that the program aims to give physicians the tools to
become efficient breastfeeding medicine experts who can confidently and
compassionately state the case for providing a baby’s nutrition via
nature’s way.
“A lot of trust develops between the OB [obstetrician] and a patient
during the course of a pregnancy and through this trust physicians have
an opportunity to not only offer evidence that supports the benefits of
breastfeeding, but reiterate what a natural, normal part of life it
is,” she said. “We inform mothers about all of the developmental
milestones their children go through during and after pregnancy, and
talking about breastfeeding should be as natural as that.”
Wagner and Chambers also see this kind of training program as a chance
to take some of the pressure and stereotypes off of lactation
consultants. “Unfortunately, sometimes our lactation consultants are
the first ones to ever talk with a woman about breastfeeding. If a
woman’s OB or family practitioner has been talking about breastfeeding
all along, then when she gets to the hospital to have the baby, she’ll
be much more comfortable with and confident about the whole process,”
Chambers said. “As a result, the lactation consultants will be free to
help with technique, answer questions and problem solve when needed.
It’s not their job to encourage mothers to breastfeed. This is a
decision a mother needs to make for herself, preferably before she
comes to the hospital to have her baby. We, as physicians, need to
support her in this process.”
Cultural
contest: Breast vs. Formula
In addition to a lack of physician training in breastfeeding medicine,
other barriers seem to keep American and especially South Carolina
mothers from automatically choosing breastfeeding as their child’s
nutrition source.
“You can’t expect women to successfully breastfeed without taking into
account the cultural context within which breastfeeding is viewed,”
Wagner said. “Fifty years ago, a scientific formula was developed that
was said to be better and a more reliable source for an infant’s
nutrition. It was big business and with a lot of advertising, women
getting into the work force, and the fact that it seemed easier, women
jumped on it. It became a status symbol to be able to say that your
child was bottle fed with formula. However, since that time, 50 years
of research in support of breastfeeding now shows us that formula isn’t
better and it isn’t the same. And even more interestingly, now
breastfeeding is becoming the status symbol.”
In addition to changing demands on a mother’s time in recent decades,
Western cultures, particularly the United States, view the breast as an
object of sexual desire, thus casting a confusing shadow across
breastfeeding for some individuals.
For example, a man walks into a restaurant and is seated next to a
family. Midway through the meal, the young infant begins to cry, and
his mother offers him her breast while still at the table. The man at
the next table complains to his waiter, labeling the act as
inappropriate and maybe even denounces it as indecent exposure. The
restaurant is forced to choose between the stated needs of the man and
the biological needs of the infant. In some cases, the nursing mother
is asked to go to the bathroom, where the stall may be the only place
to sit and feed her child. Breastfeeding advocates point out that a
toilet stall is an unnatural place for anyone to eat, let alone
unsanitary. Why do people find the act of breastfeeding in public
places inappropriate when it is natural for a mother to feed her hungry
infant?
“In American culture, the breast is a symbol of sexuality and that has
hampered the rights of breastfeeding mothers to feed their children
anywhere they choose, as they should be able to,” Wagner said. “Of 92
cultures in the world, only 13 of those cultures view breasts as sexual
symbols. Part of encouraging breastfeeding and encouraging mothers to
give their infants the best possible nutrition available is to change
how our culture sees breastfeeding.”
After several well-publicized cases and legislative attention, nursing
mothers recently received some support from the South Carolina
legislature. S.C. Code of Law Section 20-7-97 states: “A woman may
breastfeed her child in any location where the mother and her child are
authorized to be. Breastfeeding a child in a location where the mother
is authorized to be must not be considered indecent exposure.”
Wagner and Chambers also said that MUSC could further help
breastfeeding mothers within its midst by securing space for a
lactation room on campus. As of now, breastfeeding moms must find empty
offices, exam rooms or call rooms to pump when they come back to work.
“All we need is a room with a few electrical outlets and a couple of
comfortable chairs and we could make a huge difference for the unknown
number of MUSC employees who are trying to pump milk for their babies,”
Chambers said. “It takes emotional and physical energy for a mom to
maintain her milk supply when she returns to work. If we can’t support
her efforts, her chances of continuing to pump will drop. With the
known health benefits of breast milk, less breastfeeding means more
infant illness and more time off for mom to care for her sick baby.”
And it’s other little things that create big cultural barriers. “We
have to help remind maintenance and housekeeping staff that if they
walk into a patient’s room and see a mother breastfeeding her child,
that he or she doesn’t say, ‘Oh! I’m so sorry,’ and quickly run out.
Instead, that person should say ‘Wow, good for you. Would you like some
privacy?’” Wagner said. “All hospital staff are part of the health care
team. Every person who a new mother meets can influence her
breastfeeding experience, so we need to focus on what we can do to
support breastfeeding mothers.”
Friday, Nov. 24, 2006
Catalyst Online is published weekly,
updated
as needed and improved from time to time by the MUSC Office of Public
Relations
for the faculty, employees and students of the Medical University of
South
Carolina. Catalyst Online editor, Kim Draughn, can be reached at
792-4107
or by email, catalyst@musc.edu. Editorial copy can be submitted to
Catalyst
Online and to The Catalyst in print by fax, 792-6723, or by email to
catalyst@musc.edu. To place an ad in The Catalyst hardcopy, call Island
Publications at 849-1778, ext. 201.
|