Return to Main Menu
|
Procedure promising for esophogeal
cancer
by
Heather Woolwine
Public
Relations
A clinical trial under way at MUSC may provide further proof that one
company’s procedure for eliminating Barrett’s esophagus decreases the
chance of developing esophageal cancer.
Early results from studies like the one led by Robert Hawes, M.D., and
Brenda Hoffman, M.D., College of Medicine professors, have demonstrated
that the Barrett’s esophageal tissue was completely removed and
replaced by normal, healthy tissue in the majority of the procedures
performed. It is deemed as the latest inpatient treatment.
It would be difficult to find someone who has never experienced
heartburn—the results of eating that extra enchilada or Mom’s
to-die-for chocolate cake. While most people only have to deal with the
occasional case, others are plagued with a life-long condition that
emerges when stomach acid backs up into the esophagus more frequently.
This condition is known as Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).
Chronic GERD leads to increased risk of developing esophageal cancer.
Esophageal cancer has grown more than 600 percent in the past two
decades, according to the American Cancer Society, and Hoffman noted
the rise in rates for South Carolina is comparable. Combine risk
factors, like smoking or drinking alcohol, with Barrett’s esophagus,
and this kind of cancer is a real threat for many South Carolinians.
Researchers now understand that developing GERD may put individuals at
increased risk of developing a change in the lining of the, known as
Barrett’s esophagus. Those diagnosed with the condition are 25 times
more likely to develop esophageal cancer adenocarcinoma, a frequently
fatal form of cancer, than those without Barrett’s.
Patients with Barrett’s esophagus may develop precancerous changes
called dysplasia. Selected patients with dysplasia are recommended to
have their esophagus removed to avoid progression to esophageal cancer,
while others may be candidates for a new endoscopic procedure to remove
the diseased tissue.
For the clinical trial of Barrx’s Halo-360 System, Hawes and Hoffman
are recruiting patients with either a high or low degree of
dysplasia associated with Barrett’s.
“The advantages of the treatment compared to more traditional
approaches are that it is less invasive and doesn’t cause as many
complications as photodynamic therapy,” Hoffman said. “In PDT, which
involves giving a patient a light-sensitive drug and burning away
affected tissue with a laser, the abnormal tissue is burnt from the
esophageal wall. In some patients, the burn would go all the way
through the esophageal wall and those complications were cause for
extra treatment and pain. Plus, sometimes with PDT, Barrett’s can come
back.”
With the Halo-360 system, the depth of the burn is more superficial,
Hoffman added. Previously, patients had only the options of PDT,
endoscopic removal, or a surgical procedure known as an esophagectomy.
During that surgery, a portion of the esophagus is cut out and the
remaining part is reattached to the stomach. While surgery is
definitive, it has associated morbidity and mortality. Hoffman
explained that removing the lining of the esophagus with instruments
via an endoscope was excellent therapy “when all goes well, and the
results are fantastic; otherwise it becomes a nightmare requiring
invasive surgery in the chest.”
The new procedure is performed on an outpatient basis under conscious
sedation. Earlier trials showed it can eliminate Barrett’s in 75
percent of patients whose progress was followed for six to seven
months, according to Barrx’s Web site. Based on radio frequency energy,
treatment with the Halo-360 involves placing a sizing balloon into a
patient’s esophagus, followed by a catheter that is inflated against
the affected tissue. A burst of energy is then delivered through a
generator that ablates, or destroys, a very thin layer of the diseased
esophagus. Barrx said that healthy tissue has been shown to grow back
in three to four weeks.
In Hoffman’s study, researchers will look at the treatment in patients
with low and high levels of dysplasia and then randomize study
participants who may or may not receive the new treatment. All
participants receive an aggressive acid-blocking medication to minimize
discomfort. Once the study is concluded and results are accessed,
patients who did not receive the procedure during the study will then
get the real thing.
So far, the study has had a 90-percent success rate of patients with
low and high dysplasia who have undergone the treatment. In addition,
the new technique is user-friendly for gastroenterologists with
seemingly no reformation of Barrett’s once the procedure is completed
(normally in one or two sessions). Patients who undergo the procedure
can expect some chest pain and discomfort for up to three days
afterwards.
Hoffman hopes to meet full enrollment for the study by September and
will follow study patients for several years beyond their procedures to
explore any possible long-term sequella and outcomes.
To enroll or find out more about the study, contact Tammy Glenn through
Health Connection at 792-1414.
Friday, June 9, 2006
Catalyst Online is published weekly,
updated
as needed and improved from time to time by the MUSC Office of Public
Relations
for the faculty, employees and students of the Medical University of
South
Carolina. Catalyst Online editor, Kim Draughn, can be reached at
792-4107
or by email, catalyst@musc.edu. Editorial copy can be submitted to
Catalyst
Online and to The Catalyst in print by fax, 792-6723, or by email to
catalyst@musc.edu. To place an ad in The Catalyst hardcopy, call Island
Publications at 849-1778, ext. 201.
|