Return to Main Menu
|
MUSC safety, security officials keep
an eye out for Charleston
by Mary
Helen Yarborough
Public
Relations
While the term critical infrastructure evokes images of pipelines,
water plants and bridges, it also includes medical facilities such as
MUSC.
The view from
aboard a port security vessell on the Ashley River overlooking the MUSC
campus and the new hospital. MUSC is considered critical infrastructure.
As a trauma center MUSC is a key component in an all-hazards response
plan under the S.C. Department of Health and Environmental
Control (DHEC). MUSC also is working with the model federal program
operated by the U.S. Department of Justice—Project Seahawk. Project
Seahawk is a pilot project designed to address criminal activity
(including acts of terrorism) that may compromise or impede the
movement of intermodal traffic within the U.S. This was done
through the creation of a multi-agency law enforcement task force and
intelligence section. Its purpose is to establish interagency
cooperation; prevent, deter, investigate, and prosecute violations;
facilitate information sharing; fuse and analyze intelligence; and
conduct joint operations on a risk- based decision making model using a
unified command system, all while working from a multi-agency facility
which provides state-of-the-art situational awareness. The law
enforcement task force works in support (resources and information as
well as intelligence) of those lead agencies charged with port and
maritime transportation security, including U.S. Customs and Border
Protection and the Coast Guard.
Thus, Project Seahawk is a concentration of local, state and federal
resources for an all-hazards response that largely is driven by manmade
disasters. However, it is a potential resource for the community for
even natural disasters that could impede commerce, said Sean Kittrell,
an assistant U.S. Attorney for the Department of Justice who is with
the anti-terrorism unit, and also was designated to implement the
project.
While its primary goal is to protect the waterways and port of
Charleston, the fourth largest in the United States, Project Seahawk
was designed to be replicated in other major American ports. But first
it must receive continued federal funding. The White House has proposed
rescinding the $27-million project, but with Sen. Lindsey Graham’s
efforts, 100 U.S. senators have vowed to keep it intact with full
funding. Graham has introduced legislation to expand the SeaHawk
concept to additional ports across America, and Rep. Henry Brown (R-SC)
recently announced that he worked with the House Appropriations
Subcommittee to add a provision to restore funding for Project
SeaHawk. So it appears the program is here to stay.
Meanwhile, possible events the Project Seahawk team is closely
monitoring include those related to a bacterial or viral infestation,
or radiological agents, into this region that would be introduced by
cargo (smuggled fowl), workers or passengers on marine vessels. MUSC
medical teams are on call to visit ships to test for possible
infectious diseases. The project also is considering the results from
an attack on a petroleum storage tank or pipeline, damage to a chemical
facility of refinery, or an infliction that compromises a bridge and
intermodal commerce. All of these facilities are but a few miles from
MUSC and on the banks of the rivers that surround Charleston.
“MUSC is vitally important,” Kittrell said. “In fact, all hospitals
play a fundamental role in contingency planning and response. MUSC also
is a trauma center, so it works closely with DHEC in its planning. And
we work closely with DHEC.”
Response from the community and the hospital would vary, depending on
the release, attack or infection, according to Al Nesmith, MUSC
hospital’s director of safety and security. For example, a chemical
release or attack would cause facilities to transport patients and
staff to upper levels in a facility, because most chemicals are heavier
than air. A biological release or attack might require people to seek
lower levels in a facility, because biological agents are lighter than
air.
Nesmith said that in the event of an attack, a weather event or a
pandemic flu outbreak, the hospital and university are working closely
on planning.
“In the past 20 years, MUSC has demonstrated its ability to respond to
emergencies and ensure patient care,” Nesmith said. “We are quite
self-sufficient in terms of our ability to continue operations during a
crisis.”
MUSC, with its own law enforcement and security officials, is equipped
to guard its own perimeter. But hospital and university security
officials also work closely with county and state law enforcement, all
of which are part of the Project Seahawk model.
Man-made
crises
Terrorist attacks could come in many forms. A weapon of mass
destruction brought in through a container is a real concern. Other
attackscould include disrupting a gas pipeline causing an explosion and
disrupting nearby bridge and highway traffic. These could include fire
and toxic release hazards. A chemical release from one of several
facilities in the region could result in a toxic cloud that sits in a
valley or low-lying area for a period of time. Evacuation would be
necessary, but the scope of an evacuation would depend on the threat
and the reach of that threat. Because most chemical exposure causes
respiratory and skin injury, special masks and gear would be used by
first responders and those affected by the release.
An officer with
Project Seahawk conducts a port security sweep.
Hospital staff, as well as community medical service providers, is
being urged to spot injuries that could have resulted from biological
or chemical exposure.
“We’re asking businesses and people in the community, like taxi
drivers, doc-in-the boxes, and whether they have seen anything
suspicious or anyone with any weird skin injuries or strange
illnesses,” Kittrell said. He explained that key evidence at the
patient level could help avert a larger event.
“Our goal is identifying the person who might be getting ready to
do a Cole-style attack before he gets in the boat,” said
Kittrell, referring to the Oct. 12, 2000, terrorist attack on the USS
Cole in the Port of Yemen. “While we have an operations room
essentially run by the US Coast Guard which has or is getting a bunch
of sensors (like radar, wireless cameras, thermal imaging, intrusion
detection devices, radiological detection devices, intelligent video,
and camera arrays), the core of the project is the task force with
state and local law enforcement task force officers, who are deputized
as special U.S. deputy marshals.” Kittrell said that while
Project Seahawk is a model based on a concept of intelligence-led
policing, “Former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft instructed all of
us in the Department of Justice that prevention is more important than
prosecution,” he said. “Deterrence and what we could use to prevent a
horrible event is our mission. We work to eliminate turf, and are
attempting to help bridge gaps between agencies and stakeholders in
contingency planning.”
MUSC plays a key role in planning for any event that could impair the
health of one or hundreds of people at any given time. For that reason,
MUSC disaster and emergency planners are in constant communication with
local, state and federal authorities to plan for response.
Disaster planning generally takes an all-hazards approach at MUSC, said
Joe Avant, manager of MUSC’s occupational safety and health program
said. While immediate concerns focus on hurricane and avoiding
Katrina-style nightmares, Avant said that MUSC personnel is prepared
for a variety of events.
“When Hugo hit, the National Guard brought in generators, water and
ice,” Avant said. “The infrastructure was taxed. …We had a unified
command. We’ve learned not to exhaust our resources until they’re
needed. Team A deals with issues during a storm or event, and Team B
comes in and their primary role is damage assessment. We go through
every room and every building. After Hugo, we had a lot of chemical
spills where windows were blown out. That was Team B’s responsibility,
to go in and clean out the various hazards and establish clearance for
re-occupancy.”
Avant also said that existing key personnel are able to wear many hats.
“Available staff during events are able to perform a wide variety of
duties. For example, during and after Hugo, we were putting up plastic
on windows, responding to fire alarms, and assisting in patient
evacuation,” Avant said. “This was performed by about anyone who was
available—nurses, doctors, maintenance personnel, and security.”
Preparedness
and MOUs
Meetings are held and drills are conducted regularly involving MUSC.
Periodically, tabletop drills test worst-case scenarios that include
situations that couldresult from a massive chemical release, a
terrorist attack, radiological events, earthquake, and, of course, a
devastating hurricane. The drills enable planners to present scenarios
using models and assess the response and outcomes. They are
instructive, and the results help plan for more drills that account for
lessons learned.
In addition, methods for evacuating large numbers of patients have been
tested. These plans have included airlift and ground transport
planning. Currently, MUSC has memoranda of understanding (MOUs) with
hospitals located in the South Carolina Upstate and in other inland
areas to accept patients in an evacuation, said Brian Fletcher, MUSC’s
disaster preparedness coordinator. Fletcher said MUSC also has MOUs
with other transport companies to bring in ambulances in the event that
the hospital’s fleet is being used.
MUSC is ready with its existing staff, which would be divided into
teams A, B, C, and D. All nonessential personnel would stay home or
evacuate. Because the area would be in a disaster mode, the census of
patients likely would be reduced. The existing personnel would be
sufficient to handle what is required. In the event of a more
catastrophic event that would impair the workforce, the university side
would be tapped for its medical experts to fill in where clinical staff
would be strained.
Volunteers, who are so important to the quality of care during normal
conditions, would not be used during a disaster, due to safety concerns
for the volunteers, though they may be called upon in the aftermath of
an event, said Katy Kuder, MUSC’s volunteer manager.
In terms of a pandemic influenza outbreak, MUSC is adopting the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Service plan. A pandemic may present
issues that are very different from a relatively short-lived hurricane.
Should the community face a pandemic, it could last about eight weeks.
MUSC officials meet regularly to address those issues and are following
state, federal and facility guidelines to assure the best quality of
care to the patients and employees of MUSC, said Nesmith.
Editor's note: The Catalyst will feature updates on the various
disaster plans underway at MUSC.
Friday, July 7, 2006
Catalyst Online is published weekly,
updated
as needed and improved from time to time by the MUSC Office of Public
Relations
for the faculty, employees and students of the Medical University of
South
Carolina. Catalyst Online editor, Kim Draughn, can be reached at
792-4107
or by email, catalyst@musc.edu. Editorial copy can be submitted to
Catalyst
Online and to The Catalyst in print by fax, 792-6723, or by email to
catalyst@musc.edu. To place an ad in The Catalyst hardcopy, call Island
Publications at 849-1778, ext. 201.
|