Return to Main Menu
|
Study proves CT method safer for
children
by Mary
Helen Yarborough
Public
Relations
Children needing computed tomography (CT) scans do not require the same
radiation doses as adults. Still, many medical centers around the
country continue to apply the same, unnecessarily high radiation doses
when scanning children.
“Smaller bodies require less powerful CT scanner settings; and CT scans
with lower radiation have less potential to cause any damage,” said
Joseph Schoepf, M.D., a radiologist for MUSC’s Heart & Vascular
Center, and lead author of an international study published in the
American Journal of Roentgenology this month.
At MUSC, technology that reduces the radiation dose in children has
been used for years, Schoepf said. MUSC, however, is fairly unique in
this respect.
A study two years ago found that the majority of medical centers do not
reduce radiation doses when scanning children.
“Unfortunately, it has become known that many medical institutions do
not specifically adapt their CT scan procedures for use on children,
but they use the same protocols as they would in adults with
excessively high, unnecessary radiation,” Schoepf said. “MUSC has
always been at the forefront of radiation dose reduction techniques and
has been especially vigilant in children to ensure that they are imaged
as gently as possible.”
MUSC is a leader, on an international scale, in developing and
implementing methods that use the lowest achievable radiation dose in
its CT scans. Schoepf and his colleagues have helped study and apply
these methods. He often advises Siemens, a leading medical device
manufacturer; on what needs to be developed to make CTs safer and more
effective. The issue is particularly critical for children whose long
lives provide greater opportunities for radiation exposure to cause
physical harm.
“Children are our most precious and most vulnerable patients,” Schoepf
said. “CT examinations in children are ever increasing, because the
rapid examination times with cutting edge CT scanners have clear-cut
advantages in children since there is typically no need for sedation or
anesthesia. However, because of their long life ahead, it is
particularly imperative to keep radiation exposure of children at an
absolute minimum.”
The study led by MUSC in collaboration with researchers in Germany,
concludes that modulating and reducing X-ray tube voltage in CT scans
greatly cuts radiation exposure, which, therefore is preferable in the
pediatric patient population.
Researchers sought to demonstrate that: children should not be exposed
to the same radiation doses as adults, and in fact, the same radiation
is unnecessary; reduced radiation in scans over less dense organs and
tissue did not impair the image quality; and existing and available
technology was successful in reducing radiation without impairing image
quality.
The technological method, enhanced with a software application, enables
the CT scanner to sense dense and less solid areas of the body, which
automatically reduces the tube voltage to the minimum level for safety,
but an adequate level to capture a clear diagnostic image.
“We found that radiation used on children from CT scanning can be kept
at a bare minimum if the examination technique is carefully adapted to
the age and weight of the child,” Schoepf said. “Sophisticated
technology constantly adapts the radiation level to the body part that
is being examined, so that only the bare minimum of radiation is
applied at all times.”
For example, the radiation dose would decline significantly over the
delicate lungs, but would increase adequately over the more solid liver
and shoulders.
“The beauty of this scanner is that it detects density and reduces
radiation levels on the fly,” Schoepf said. “We found that these
advanced technologies provided a significant reduction in radiation
compared to older and less sophisticated scanner types, which are
commonly used throughout the country.”
Friday, May 9, 2008
Catalyst Online is published weekly,
updated
as needed and improved from time to time by the MUSC Office of Public
Relations
for the faculty, employees and students of the Medical University of
South
Carolina. Catalyst Online editor, Kim Draughn, can be reached at
792-4107
or by email, catalyst@musc.edu. Editorial copy can be submitted to
Catalyst
Online and to The Catalyst in print by fax, 792-6723, or by email to
catalyst@musc.edu. To place an ad in The Catalyst hardcopy, call Island
Publications at 849-1778, ext. 201.
|